Skip to main content
See every side of every news story
Published loading...Updated

New Jersey takes fight over Kalshi's prediction market to US Supreme Court

The state says federal appeals courts are split on whether Kalshi’s sports contracts are swaps or gambling, and 20 states have challenged the platforms.

  • On Tuesday, New Jersey petitioned the Supreme Court to resolve how prediction markets should be governed, challenging a lower court ruling that favored KalshiEX LLC and seeking nationwide regulatory clarity.
  • A legal conflict emerged when the Ninth Circuit Court ruled last week that states can regulate prediction markets as sports betting, directly contradicting the Third Circuit Court's April decision favoring federal jurisdiction.
  • New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport argues prediction firms "have no right to offer their sports bets without following state law," a position shared by a bipartisan coalition of 44 states.
  • Chairman Mike Selig of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission maintains exclusive federal jurisdiction over these markets, while the Trump administration has aggressively asserted these offerings are "swaps" subject to federal oversight.
  • Justices may choose to wait until fall to decide whether to hear the case, potentially allowing other pending disputes to resolve first. If accepted, a ruling could arrive by next summer.
Insights by Ground AI

53 Articles

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 52% of the sources are Center
52% Center

Factuality Info Icon

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

Info Icon

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

TFD broke the news on Tuesday, September 1, 2026.
Too Big Arrow Icon
Sources are mostly out of (0)

Similar News Topics

News
Feed Dots Icon
For You
Search Icon
Search
Blindspot LogoBlindspotLocal