Nearly 300 scientists apply for French academic program amid Trump cuts in U.S.
- Ashley Dayer, an early-career Virginia Tech professor with an infant and a limited lab budget, won a National Science Foundation grant for bird conservation after years of research and three failed applications.
- The Trump administration abruptly cut funding to Dayer and over 380 other NSF projects on Friday to comply with directives ending support for diversity, equity, inclusion, and misinformation research.
- Dayer's project involved data from more than 20,000 Americans on birdwatching habits and mental well-being and explicitly aimed to engage disabled people and people of color, linking diversity mainly to bird populations.
- NSF canceled 402 grants labeled 'wasteful DEI grants' totaling $233 million, with NSF director Sethuraman Panchanathan affirming support for broadening participation without preference, while scientists expressed concern over transparency and lasting impacts.
- The funding cuts, though a small portion of NSF's total awards, have disrupted several professors and student teams, raising fears of an 'outright attack on science' and jeopardizing future research careers.
232 Articles
232 Articles
Coffee Break: The Current State of Science During Trump v.2.0 Plus One Signal Advance
As someone who has spent most of his working life as a scientific worker and later as an academic scientist, graduate supervisor, teacher, grant reviewer, and administrator, the current devastation being visited upon my colleagues and their institutions is sickening. I have never thought my work was more useful or more important than anyone else’s. […]

Trump science cuts roil university labs, targeting bird feeder research, AI literacy work and more
Hundreds of university researchers in the U.S. have had their National Science Foundation funding abruptly canceled to comply with President Donald Trump’s directive to end support of research on diversity, equity and inclusion, as well as the study of misinformation.
Climate Research: Trump's Mistakes in the Science War
No science is more politicized than climate research. Donald Trump has reason to question funding for the "climate-industrial complex" of activists and NGOs. But in his general attack on climate science, the US president goes far too far.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 43% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage