See every side of every news story
Published loading...Updated

Watchdog says over 100 chemical weapons sites may still remain in Syria

  • Chemical weapons inspectors reported on April 6, 2025, that over 100 unsecured chemical weapons sites may remain in Syria after Assad's fall.
  • This concern follows Assad's use of sarin and chlorine gas until at least 2018 despite Damascus agreeing in 2013 to give up its chemical stockpiles.
  • The sites, suspected to house sarin, chlorine, and mustard gas, are linked to research, manufacture, and storage of chemical weapons amid unclear government control.
  • The OPCW estimates more than 100 sites, far exceeding Assad's declared numbers, and fears terrorists could access deadly materials, highlighting major security risks.
  • This situation implies ongoing threats from chemical weapons remnants, challenging international efforts to secure and eliminate Syria's chemical arsenal.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?

24 Articles

All
Left
2
Center
2
Right
9
Center

There could be more than 100 abandoned chemical weapons sites in Syria, far higher than any previous estimate and a test for the new government after the fall of former President Bashar al-Assad, The New York Times reported on Monday.

·Romania
Read Full Article
Lean Left

The Assad regime has produced C weapons for decades and has also used them against its own people. Israel has bombed several depots after the overthrow. Now the »New York Times« reports: There is much more to it than previously thought.

·Germany
Read Full Article
Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 69% of the sources lean Right
69% Right
Factuality

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

Quotidiano Nazionale broke the news in Italy on Sunday, April 6, 2025.
Sources are mostly out of (0)

You have read 1 out of your 5 free daily articles.

Join millions of well-informed readers who use Ground to compare coverage, check their news blindspots, and challenge their worldview.