Moraes requires virtual session for First Tour to analyze process suspension against Ramagem

The STF (Federal Supreme Court) will begin analyzing this Friday (May 9, 2025) the suspension of the criminal proceedings against Congressman Alexandre Ramagem (PL-RJ), a defendant in the Court for attempted coup d'état in 2022. The analysis will end on May 13. The virtual session will begin at 11 am and was scheduled by the president of the 1st Panel of the STF, Minister Cristiano Zanin. The magistrate responded to a request from the case's rap…

The Supreme Federal Court (STF) marked for this Saturday (9), at 11h, the judgment of the Chamber of Deputies which suspended the criminal action against Federal Member Alexandre Ramagem (PL-RJ) in the case of the strike involving former President Jair Bolsonaro. The trial will be carried out in the virtual plenary of the First Tour of the Court, formed by the ministers of Morees, rapporteur of the case, Flávio Dino, Carmen Lúcia, Luis Fux and C…

In this fourth, by 315 votes to 143, parliamentarians decided to work criminal proceedings against the Associated Member of Jair Bolsonaro. STF understands that suspension cannot be comprehensive.

Minister Alexandre de Moraes, of the Federal Supreme Court (STF), requested this Thursday (8) the convening of a virtual session of the First Chamber to evaluate the decision of the Chamber of Deputies that suspended the criminal action against federal deputy Alexandre Ramagem (PL-RJ), related to the coup scheme of former president Jair Bolsonaro. The request was made after the president of the Chamber, Hugo Motta (Republicanos-PB), notified the…

By Cleber Lourenço The Chamber of Deputies formally filed with the Federal Supreme Court (STF) the request to suspend Criminal Action No. 1/2025 against Congressman Alexandre Ramagem (PL-RJ), accused of involvement in the attempted coup d'état on January 8. The document was filed at 11:14 am this Wednesday (8), one day after the […]

Camera suspended the criminal action against Ramagem by 315 votes in favour and 143 against, contrary to the determination of the First Turma.