Published • loading... • Updated
Minnesota sheriffs respond to vote of no confidence in DOC commissioner
More than 70 of Minnesota's 87 county sheriffs expressed no confidence in DOC leadership, citing inconsistent rule enforcement and operational challenges under Commissioner Schnell.
- On Dec. 22, the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association held a no-confidence vote targeting Paul Schnell, supported by more than 70 county sheriffs in Greater Minnesota.
- Sheriffs argued inconsistent Minnesota Department of Corrections rules and enforcement create operational problems, including housing inmates from other county jails across Minnesota.
- Several sheriffs including Goodhue County's Marty Kelly and Mower County's Steve Sandvik publicly endorsed the MSA's no-confidence resolution, while Jason Riggs, Beltrami County Sheriff, and Troy Heck, Benton County Sheriff, described poor leadership and an adversarial shift under Commissioner Schnell.
- MSA members urged the Department of Corrections leadership to adopt clearer goals and be an asset, while Meeker County Sheriff Brian Cruze wrote `It's time for new leadership at the MN Department of Corrections`.
- Sheriffs highlighted interactions with the Jail Inspection and Law Enforcement Unit as a source of operational challenges, underscoring a confrontation between county jails across Minnesota and DOC leadership.
Insights by Ground AI
15 Articles
15 Articles
+14 Reposted by 14 other sources
Minnesota sheriffs respond to vote of no confidence in DOC commissioner
MINNEAPOLIS — Sheriffs from several law enforcement agencies around Greater Minnesota support the Minnesota Sheriffs’ Association vote of no confidence against Department of Corrections Commissioner Paul Schnell. The Dec. 22 no-confidence vote was called amid ongoing issues and operational challenges related to interactions with the department and its leadership and the Jail Inspection and Law Enforcement Unit. In recent years, “the DOC has begu…
·Cherokee County, United States
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources15
Leaning Left0Leaning Right8Center4Last UpdatedBias Distribution67% Right
Bias Distribution
- 67% of the sources lean Right
67% Right
C 33%
R 67%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium








