The Rational Behind Each Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Voting For or Against Merging the Moraes, STF Case
9 Articles
9 Articles
The Rational Behind Each Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Voting For or Against Merging the Moraes, STF Case
Vote-by-vote: what each Brazilian Supreme Court justice argued Sept. 15 on Alexandre de Moraes — and the real story behind the Gilmar-Mendonça clash.
Minister asks for more time to appreciate point of order after discussion between Gilmar Mendes and André Mendonça and says that request for view occurred because Fachin did not take 'provisions'.
Flávio Dino questioned the decision of the President of the Court, Edson Fachin, to bring to you the report of the case. Gilmar Mendes then presented a point of order on the subject.
Dean of the STF states that the rapporteur retained data to act as electoral cable of Flávio
Ministers Flávio Dino and Gilmar Mendes ordered the sabotage of the trial on the opening of investigation against Moraes.
The Supreme Federal Court (STF) formed a score of 4 to 3 to deny the question of order presented by the dean, Gilmar Mendes. The minister proposed that Alexandre de Moraes's opening of investigation be analyzed together with the action that points to irregularities in the performance of André Mendonça – a case that is based on [...]
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 34% of the sources lean Left, 33% of the sources are Center, 33% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium









