Louisiana death row conviction overturned as man's lawyers cite faulty forensic analysis
- A Louisiana man's death row conviction for murder was overturned after his legal team cited faulty forensic analysis involving bite mark evidence and an autopsy by two 'discredited charlatans'.
- The judge ruled that the bite mark analysis was not scientifically defensible, and that the death appeared to be accidental drowning.
- The district attorney can appeal, seek a retrial with new evidence, or accept the ruling leading to the man's release after nearly three decades on death row.
30 Articles
30 Articles
Louisiana death row conviction overturned as man's lawyers cite faulty forensic analysis - American Press
A Louisiana man who has spent nearly three decades on death row has had his conviction overturned by a district judge following a review of forensic analysis that the inmate’s legal team argued was based on “junk science.” Jimmie Duncan was originally convicted of first-degree murder in 1998 after being accused by prosecutors of raping and drowning his girlfriend’s toddler in a bathtub. Prosecutors relied on bite mark analysis and an autopsy per…
Louisiana death row conviction overturned after 28 years
KEY TAKEAWAYS: Jimmie Duncan’s 1998 murder conviction overturned over faulty forensics Bite mark evidence ruled unreliable “junk science” by experts Jailhouse informant recanted; ineffective counsel cited by court Lawmakers now seek to limit post-conviction relief efforts A Louisiana man who has spent nearly three decades on death row has had his conviction overturned by a district judge following a review of forensic analysis that the i…
Louisiana Judge Sets Aside Jimmie Duncan’s Conviction and Death Sentence Based on “No Longer Valid” Bite Mark Evidence | Death Penalty Information Center
On April 24, 2025, Louisiana District Court Judge Alvin Sharp set aside Jimmie Duncan’s first-degree murder conviction and death sentence. Mr. Duncan was sentenced to death for the 1993 death of his girlfriend’s toddler largely based on faulty bite mark evidence. Judge Sharp, in a decision that came after a September 2024 evidentiary hearing, held that expert testimony presented during this hearing demonstrated the bite mark…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 52% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage