Jupiter was formerly twice its current size and had a much stronger magnetic field, study says
- Researchers Konstantin Batygin and Fred Adams published a study in 2025 revealing Jupiter was twice its current size 3.8 million years after solar system solids formed.
- They based their findings on analyzing the orbits of Jupiter’s small moons Amalthea and Thebe, which act as fossil records of its early state.
- The study showed Jupiter’s volume exceeded two times today’s size and that its magnetic field was roughly 50 times stronger, fueled by rapid accretion from a protoplanetary disk.
- Batygin described this finding as an important reference point that enhances our ability to trace the solar system’s development, while Adams expressed amazement that after billions of years, there is still sufficient evidence to piece together Jupiter’s early characteristics.
- This refined model supports Jupiter’s critical role in stabilizing planetary orbits and enhances understanding of early planet formation across the entire solar system.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
Podcasts & Opinions
29 Articles
29 Articles
All
Left
3
Center
9
Right
1
Determination of Jupiter’s primordial physical state
The formation and early evolution of Jupiter played a pivotal role in sculpting the large-scale architecture of the Solar System, intertwining the narrative of Jovian early years with the broader story of the Solar System’s origins. The details and chronology of Jupiter’s formation, however, remain elusive, primarily due to the inherent uncertainties of accretionary models, highlighting the need for independent constraints. Here we show that, by…
·United Kingdom
Read Full ArticleJupiter Was Once Twice Its Size - And Its Magnetic Field Could Fry Spacecraft
Jupiter's early evolution and gravitational influence played a crucial role in shaping the solar system's structure and planetary orbits, earning it the title of the solar system's "architect."
·New Delhi, India
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources29
Leaning Left3Leaning Right1Center9Last UpdatedBias Distribution69% Center
Bias Distribution
- 69% of the sources are Center
69% Center
L 23%
C 69%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage