Judge rejects Hudson’s Bay proposal in creditor protection case
- An Ontario judge rejected Hudson's Bay's restructuring agreement, increasing the risk of lenders pushing the company into receivership.
- The rejected agreement aimed to give lenders more power over Hudson's Bay's creditor protection process.
- Judge Peter Osborne stated the agreement was 'neither necessary nor appropriate at this time.'
- Hudson's Bay began liquidating almost all of its stores this week due to significant financial difficulties.
35 Articles
35 Articles
Judge Rejects Hudson’s Bay Proposal in Creditor Protection Case
An Ontario judge rejected a Hudson’s Bay restructuring agreement Saturday evening, increasing the likelihood that lenders may seek to push the company into receivership. In a written decision issued Saturday, Ontario Superior Court judge Peter Osborne said he declined to approve the agreement because it is “neither necessary nor appropriate at this time.” The agreement wouldn’t have just given the embattled department store an April deadline to …

Judge rejects Hudson’s Bay proposal in creditor protection case
On Saturday evening, an Ontario judge dismissed Hudson’s Bay's restructuring agreement, raising the chances that lenders could move to push the company into receivership.
Judge rejects Hudson's Bay proposal in creditor protection case
TORONTO — An Ontario judge rejected a Hudson’s Bay restructuring agreement Saturday evening, increasing the likelihood that lenders may seek to push the company into receivership. In a written decision issued Saturday, Ontario Superior Court judge Peter Osborne said he declined to approve the agreement because it is “neither necessary nor appropriate at this time.” […]
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 60% of the sources lean Left
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage