All eyes turn to Supreme Court as challenge tests presidential power
- On Wednesday, November 5 the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, challenging President Donald Trump's use of the Emergency Powers Act of 1977 to impose tariffs, a case with potential to set significant legal precedent.
- Invoking IEEPA, the administration pursued tariffs without congressional approval, and President Donald Trump declared April 2 `Liberation Day` enacting broad import duties from Canada to China.
- A brief signed by over 10 American economists argues trade deficits are not 'unusual and extraordinary' and warns tariffs will have a 'massive impact' across the U.S.
- Three lower courts have ruled against the emergency-tariff actions, and Trump officials say they would reimpose tariffs if the Supreme Court overturns them; the Supreme Court expedited schedule suggests a swift ruling.
- The 'major questions' doctrine, central to the case, may limit or expand future presidential emergency authority, with challengers citing writings by Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, and the Supreme Court composition influencing the decision.
343 Articles
343 Articles
A decision against US President Donald Trump would break down an important pillar of his economic policy.
Has Donald Trump gone too far with his customs policy? In the hearing before the Supreme Court, it becomes clear that the supreme judges could also face the US President on this issue.
The judges, before whom the legality of the tariffs imposed by the US president was contested, were critical of the Advocate General, who defended the prerogatives of the executive.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 48% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium








































