Skip to main content
See every side of every news story
Published loading...Updated

Uttarakhand High Court Questions ‘Mohammad’ Deepak’s Plea for Protection, Calls It ‘Pressure Tactic’

The Uttarakhand High Court called Mohammad Deepak's request for police protection 'wholly unwarranted' and said it may indicate an attempt to influence ongoing investigations.

  • On March 19, 2026, the Uttarakhand High Court questioned a petition by Mohammad Deepak, calling it 'wholly unwarranted' and indicative of an attempt to influence the probe.
  • Earlier this year Mohammad Deepak confronted right-wing activists accused of harassing 71-year-old Muslim shop owner Vakeel Ahmed on Republic Day in Kotdwar, and a video of the confrontation went viral with protests outside his gym on January 31, 2026.
  • The petition under Article 226 sought quashing of an FIR, police protection, and a departmental inquiry, with the State reporting two FIRs had already been registered and no threat perception reported by the investigating officer.
  • The court questioned the petition's maintainability, cautioned counsel against sensationalising, and listed the matter for Friday after granting time until the next day.
  • The episode drew national attention and affected Deepak's business as gym memberships declined, while the court called the petition an 'abuse of process' and a 'pressure tactic' lacking evidence.
Insights by Ground AI

16 Articles

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 75% of the sources lean Left
75% Left

Factuality Info Icon

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

Info Icon

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

livelaw.in broke the news in India on Thursday, March 19, 2026.
Too Big Arrow Icon
Sources are mostly out of (0)

Similar News Topics

News
Feed Dots Icon
For You
Search Icon
Search
Blindspot LogoBlindspotLocal