Get access to our best features
Get access to our best features
Published 10 days ago

Here’s why Harvey Weinstein’s New York rape conviction was tossed and what happens next

  • The New York Court of Appeals determined that the trial judge in Weinstein's rape case was biased due to improper rulings, allowing uncharged allegations to be heard.
  • The Court's majority criticized Judge James Burke's decision as an "abuse of judicial discretion" for permitting testimonies on alleged misconduct not directly related to the charges.
  • Despite the decision, the Manhattan district attorney's office intends to pursue the case, potentially requiring accusers to recount their experiences in court.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?

0 Articles

All
Left
Center
Right
Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 61% of the sources are Center
61% Center
Factuality

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

Sources are mostly out of (0)