Published 8 hours ago • loading... • Updated 7 hours ago

Here Are the Supreme Court Precedents that Targeting ‘Hate Speech’ Would Violate

Summary by KIFI

By John Fritze, Devan Cole, CNN (CNN) — Attorney General Pam Bondi’s opaque threat to target “hate speech” following the assassination of conservative crusader Charlie Kirk would, if carried out, run up against a litany of Supreme Court precedent on an issue that has largely united conservative and liberal justices for decades. Bondi has drawn

Podcasts & Opinions

Podcast Mention

Lean Left

Justice Matters with Glenn Kirschner

Weekday Legal and Analysis podcast featuring Glenn Kirschner

Lean Left

Weekday Legal and Analysis podcast featuring Glenn Kirschner

Pam Bondi is NOT Very Good At Attorney General-ing

Justice Matters with Glenn Kirschner discuss Pam Bondi’s controversial hate speech blunder and its constitutional implications.

16 hours ago

Listen to Full Episode Full Episode Unlock Timestamp

Get Vantage — Podcasts, Ratings, Timestamps

Podcasts & Opinions

9 Articles

CNN

+8 Reposted by 8 other sources

Lean Left

Here are the Supreme Court precedents that targeting ‘hate speech’ would violate

Attorney General Pam Bondi’s opaque threat to target “hate speech” following the assassination of conservative crusader Charlie Kirk would, if caried out, run up against a litany of Supreme Court precedent on an issue that has largely united conservative and liberal justices for decades.

8 hours ago·Atlanta, United States

Read Full Article

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/year