Calling One's Spouse a 'Donkey' Is Considered Grounds for Both Divorce and Compensation.
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.7 Articles
7 Articles
The 2nd Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals found a man who insulted his wife by calling her "a donkey, an animal" to be seriously at fault in a divorce case. The Chamber ruled that these statements constituted an attack on the woman's personal rights and decided that she should be awarded material and moral damages.
The 2nd Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals found a husband who insulted his wife by calling her "a donkey, an animal" during a divorce case to be heavily at fault. The Supreme Court overturned the local court's decision of "equal fault," ruling that such insults...Click here for more.
A young couple filed for divorce at the Family Court due to severe incompatibility. The Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling regarding the use of derogatory terms like "you're a donkey" and "you're an animal" between spouses.
A husband who called his wife an "ass, an animal" was found to be grossly at fault by the 2nd Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals. The court noted that the word "ass" constituted an attack on the woman's personal rights and ruled that the man should be ordered to pay both material and moral damages.
The 2nd Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals, reviewing an appeal in a divorce case, deemed a husband who called his wife an "ass, an animal" to be seriously at fault. The Chamber noted that the word "ass" constituted an attack on the woman's personal rights and ruled that the man should be ordered to pay both material and moral damages.
The 2nd Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals, reviewing an appeal in a divorce case, deemed a husband who called his wife an "ass" and an "animal" to be seriously at fault. The Chamber noted that the word "ass" constituted an attack on the woman's personal rights and ruled that the man should be ordered to pay both material and moral damages.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
