Federal tax on firearms suppressors gone, but Illinois’ ban remains
UNITED STATES, JUL 10 – The lawsuit argues the National Firearms Act lacks constitutional basis after the $200 excise tax on suppressors and certain firearms was eliminated by federal law.
7 Articles
7 Articles
Newsletter: NFA’s New $0 Tax on Silencers, SBRs Draws Legal Challenge
Nearly as fast as the new National Firearms Act (NFA) tax cuts became law, they became targets of a new lawsuit. And not one from those who want to see the taxes put back into place, but, rather, those who want to see the NFA altogether undone. Gun Owner of America (GOA) and a coalition of other advocates joined together to file the first lawsuit against the new NFA language. Source
'One Big Beautiful Lawsuit' Seeks to Eliminate Gun Control Law
Second Amendment advocates hope what they dubbed the “One Big Beautiful Lawsuit” will strike a final blow to a near century old gun control law. The one big, beautiful bill that President Donald Trump signed on July 4 included a provision to reduce the $200 excise tax on buying certain firearms, suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and short-barreled shotguns down to $0. The $200 tax was the core portion of the 1934 National Firearms Act, which …
Federal tax on firearms suppressors gone, but Illinois’ ban remains – Center Square
Illinois currently bans ownership of firearm suppressors, one of only a handful of states to do so. A federal lawsuit, Anderson v. Raoul, challenges the ban as unconstitutional, and is awaiting a ruling after being delayed pending a related case.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources lean Right
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium