‘F-word’ may be offensive, but not obscene: Supreme Court on abusive language
The court said vulgar language alone does not meet the legal test for obscenity under Section 294(b), narrowing convictions in speech cases.
6 Articles
6 Articles
Supreme Court holds abuse is uncivil, but not obscene
In a judgment in a land dispute case in which the four-letter expletive was used, the top court says that to qualify as ‘obscenity’, the terms used must be lascivious, should appeal to prurient interests of people, and provoke a tendency to deprave and corrupt people’s minds
Swear words, vulgar expletives alone do not amount to obscenity: SC
The Supreme Court has ruled that mere swear words, profanities, and vulgar expletives, however offensive, do not amount to obscenity under Section 294 of the Indian Penal Code. The court clarified that for an utterance to be considered obscene, it must be lascivious, appeal to prurient interests, and have the tendency to deprave and corrupt minds. This ruling came while hearing a plea challenging a high court order confirming a conviction under IPC Section 294.
Mere use of swear words does not amount to obscenity: Supreme Court
The case stemmed from a property dispute in Tamil Nadu in August 2017. According to the prosecution, the accused abused the complainant using vulgar language and caste-based slurs during an altercation over agricultural land.
'Vulgar does not mean obscene': Supreme Court sets aside conviction under IPC Section 294
The Supreme Court has ruled that using abusive or vulgar language, including swear words, does not automatically amount to obscenity under the law unless it meets specific legal requirements.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium



