Skip to main content
Get facts, not fiction
Published • loading... • Updated

ECI rejects claim of unilateral decisions by CEC, says key SIR orders were unanimous

The commission said the three SIR orders were approved unanimously and rejected claims that Form 6 was amended, as the Supreme Court weighs multiple petitions.

  • On Monday, the Election Commission of India filed a nearly 250-page affidavit in the Supreme Court, asserting that all three Special Intensive Revision orders were unanimously approved by Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and both Election Commissioners.
  • Rejecting allegations that it amended statutory Form 6, the ECI stated the additional declaration introduced for SIR was a separate document intended to facilitate eligibility verification through a "mapping" concept.
  • The affidavit confirmed a controversial July 28 office order regarding internal work allocation was "never implemented" following a joint direction by both Election Commissioners, while clarifying that internal file notes do not constitute final decisions.
  • Granting 10 days to petitioners to respond, the Supreme Court deferred the hearing on SIR challenges until November 17, allowing time for legal examination of the ECI's affidavit.
  • Petitions from Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi and other INDIA bloc leaders allege arbitrary decision-making and alleged "vote chori" during the revision process, prompting nationwide protests and demands for an SIT probe.
Insights by Ground AI

66 Articles

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 57% of the sources lean Right
57% Right

Factuality Info Icon

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

Info Icon

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

Social News XYZ broke the news on Monday, October 26, 2026.
Too Big Arrow Icon
Sources are mostly out of (0)

Similar News Topics

News
Feed Dots Icon
For You
Search Icon
Search
Blindspot LogoBlindspotLocal