Dominga Project: Antofagasta Court Annuls Resolution Seeking to Enforce Environmental Judgement
9 Articles
9 Articles
Unanimously, the Court of Appeal of Antofagasta overturned the decision of the First Environmental Court, considering that “its application is impermissible”. Thus, the procedure ordered by the Committee of Ministers to vote again on the Dominga port mining project is annulled. The Second Chamber of the Court determined that the decision of the First Environmental Court in February 2025 does not correspond to a case provided for by law.
The Court of Appeal of Antofagasta decided to annul ex officio all actions taken in the incidental enforcement proceedings of the First Environmental Court in the framework of the Dominga Project case, considering that this procedure was applied to a situation not provided for by law.The decision was adopted unanimously by the Second Chamber of the High Court, composed of the ministers Dinko Franulic Cetinic, Eric Sepúlveda Casanova and Jaime Ro…
50 visits The resolution highlights the illegal action of the First Environmental Court of Antofagasta, which tried to force the Committee of Ministers to approve the Dominga project is rejected, as noted by the Committee of Ministers and lawyers of Alianza Humboldt celebrate resolution The Court of Appeals of Antofagasta gave a hard blow to the Dominga harbour mining project, confirming the rejection given to the mining company by the Committee…
The Court of Appeal of Antofagasta confirmed the rejection of the Dominga harbour mining project in Coquimbo, after revealing the illegal action of the First Environmental Tribunal of Antofagasta, which tried to force the Committee of Ministers to approve the project. In its resolution, the Court states that the Environmental Tribunal of Antofagasta exceeded its powers [...] The entry The door of justice to Dominga was first published in Desenfo…
The Second Chamber of the High Court – composed of ministers Dinko Franulic Cetinic, Eric Sepúlveda Casanova and Jaime Rojas Mundaca – established that the decision issued by the First Environmental Court in February 2025 does not correspond to a case provided for by law.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium




