ECI rejects claim of unilateral decisions by CEC, says key SIR orders were unanimous
The poll body said the revision orders were approved by all three members and that Form 6 was not amended.
- On Monday, the Election Commission of India filed a nearly 250-page affidavit in the Supreme Court, rejecting allegations that Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar acted unilaterally and asserting all three Special Intensive Revision orders were unanimously approved by its three members.
- Reports that Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi formally objected 14 times in 10 months to decisions they claimed were made without their knowledge prompted these legal challenges regarding the Commission's internal functioning.
- The Commission denied amending Form 6, stating the SIR declaration is a separate 'mapping' document, and confirmed an internal July 28, 2026 order regarding work allocation was 'never implemented' following a joint direction by the two Election Commissioners.
- During Tuesday's proceedings, the Supreme Court granted petitioners 10 days to respond to the ECI's affidavit. Chief Justice of India Surya Kant's bench scheduled the next hearing for November 17 following the Diwali break.
- Opposition leaders including Rahul Gandhi continue challenging the SIR process, alleging irregular voter deletions and alleged 'vote chori.' The court will examine the Commission's constitutional mandate and procedural legality in upcoming sessions.
63 Articles
63 Articles
ECI rejects claim of unilateral decisions by CEC, says key SIR orders were unanimous
It asserted that its key Special Intensive Revision (SIR) orders were unanimously approved, that it had not amended Form 6, and that, in urgent matters, the concurrence of members could be obtained electronically and formally recorded on file subsequently.
CEC Gyanesh Kumar didn't bypass colleagues on SIR: ECI to SC
NEW DELHI: The Election Commission of India has rejected allegations that Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar took decisions concerning the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) without the approval of his two fellow Commissioners. In a counter-affidavit filed before the Supreme Court on October 26, the poll body maintained that all three SIR orders were approved unanimously. The affidavit was filed by Deputy Election Commissioner Bhanu Prakash…
ECI Tells SC SIR Decisions Were Unanimous, Denies Amending Form 6
Get latest articles and stories on India at LatestLY. The Election Commission of India (ECI) on Monday told the Supreme Court that all three orders concerning the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls were taken unanimously by the Commission, while denying that it amended Form 6 through the SIR orders. India News | ECI Tells SC SIR Decisions Were Unanimous, Denies Amending Form 6.
SIR controversy: Election Commission says all three members approved orders, denies amending Form 6
In its counter-affidavit filed before the apex court, the poll panel said the SIR orders issued on June 24, 2025, October 27, 2025, and May 14, 2026, were approved unanimously by Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar and Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 57% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium























