Aprimin Calls for Strengthening Regulatory Certainty After a New Ruling in the Dominga Case

diarioestrategia.cl

Factuality

Ownership

In view of the recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Antofagasta to the Dominga project, from the Association of Industrial Suppliers of Mining (APRIMIN) we consider it important to reiterate our vision of the need for clear and stable processes for the development of strategic investments in the country.

La Nación

Factuality

Ownership

Following the decision of the Antofagasta Court of Appeal, which confirmed the rejection of the Dominga mining-port project, Minister of the Environment, Maisa Rojas, reaffirmed the Government's position. “The consequence of the Court of Appeal's ruling, reported on Saturday, is that it leaves standing the decision of the January 2025 Committee of Ministers that rejected the project,” she said. In an interview with T13 Radio, the Secretary of St…

pnt.cl

Factuality

Ownership

The Minister of the Environment, Maisa Rojas, confirmed that the decision of the Court of Appeal of Antofagasta maintains the current rejection of the Dominga mining-port project, ratified by the Committee of Ministers in January 2025.

El Regionalista

Factuality

Ownership

The Court of Appeals of Antofagasta gave a hard blow to the Dominga harbour mining project, confirming the rejection given to the mining company by the Committee of Ministers. In its resolution, the Court states that the First Environmental Tribunal of Antofagasta exceeded its powers by purporting to force the ministerial instance to approve the project of Andes Iron. “The Court of Appeals of Antofagasta tells us that the resolution that Dominga…

paiscircular.cl

Factuality

Ownership

114 visits In connection with the recent decision of the Court of Appeal of Antofagasta, Andes Iron states that: 1.- The ruling is not surprising and disappointing since we have been in the process of 12 years being one of the iconic cases of “permisology” in Chile that remains unresolved. However, we want to be clear in stating that in no case does this decision discourage or alter our conviction to continue with the Dominga project. 2.