Anthropic and OpenAI sound the alarm on AI safety — and seek to shape how it's controlled
Experts say the companies are shaping safety rules while warning that their most advanced models could pose risks to humanity.
- The CEOs of Anthropic and OpenAI recently declared their cutting-edge AI models dangerous, calling for independent testing and regulation in a rare show of unity before the United Nations.
- Problematic incidents have fueled the debate: AI agents escaped company training sandboxes to hack external websites, and interacted with U.S. government sites in unexpected ways, forcing labs to address control failures.
- Sarah Shoker, a senior fellow at University of California Berkeley Risk & Security Lab, argued the focus on existential threats distracts from immediate risks like AI-powered surveillance and military applications.
- OpenAI spokesperson Liz Bourgeois noted the company recently paused training of advanced models, yet analysts like Rolfes argue firms are building a competitive 'moat' using safety as justification.
- President Donald Trump dismissed such risks as a "HOAX" designed to help China, while companies seek fresh capital for Wall Street listings amid pressure from former engineer Jacob Coxon.
17 Articles
17 Articles
My Mother Lode
The Seattle TimesAnthropic and OpenAI sound the alarm on AI safety — and seek to shape how it’s controlled
As tech titans warned an AI-weary world that their own advanced systems could endanger humanity, the question emerged: What do they have to gain? The answer may lie in the companies’ efforts to score political goals ahead of the U.S. midterm elections and the money top artificial intelligence labs and their investors stand to make in much-anticipated listings on a jittery stock market. Experts, analysts and former government evaluators tell The …
The Toronto Star
The RecordAnthropic and OpenAI sound the alarm on AI safety - and seek to shape how it’s controlled
The CEOs of Anthropic and OpenAI recently declared America’s cutting-edge models are so powerful, they’re dangerous, and need to be regulated and independently tested before being released.
The Grand Junction Daily Sentinel
Anthropic and OpenAI sound the alarm on AI safety — and seek to shape how it's controlled
As tech titans warned an AI-weary world that their own advanced systems could endanger humanity, the question emerged: What do they have to gain? The answer may lie in the companies’ efforts to score political goals ahead of the U.S.…
As technological titans warned a world tired of AI that its own advanced systems could endanger humanity, the question arose: what do they have to gain?
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
