US EditionConservatives fume over the Justice Barrett siding against Trump on foreign aid freeze
- Amy Coney Barrett sided with John Roberts and three liberal justices to require the Trump administration to pay nearly $2 billion in foreign aid reimbursements, countering the administration's efforts to freeze these payments.
- Barrett faces backlash from conservative groups after this decision, but she has historically supported significant conservative causes, according to Ed Whelan, a conservative lawyer.
- Critics, including Jack Posobiec, labeled Barrett as a disappointment, arguing that her vote reflects deeper issues regarding Republican commitments to certain values, while other conservatives defended her track record.
- The Supreme Court's ruling reinforces the tension within conservative circles over foreign aid, prompting some to question Barrett's alignment with Trump's agenda.
55 Articles
55 Articles
Post from Tony Seruga - LewRockwell
Thanks, Saleh Abdullah. Following up on tips that Justice Amy Coney Barrett was in communication with leadership at the number one human trafficking organization in the world, Catholic Charities, an organization that relied on billions from USAID. According to Forbes, Catholic Charities USA was the… https://t.co/6W36w0dbOW pic.twitter.com/LyQ6MoYEYa — Tony Seruga (@TonySeruga) March 6, 2025 The post Post from Tony Seruga appeared first on LewRo…
Amy Coney Barrett Loses Favor with Conservatives After Voting Against Trump on Foreign Aid Decision
Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett has fallen out of favor with conservatives following her recent vote on President Donald Trump's freeze on foreign aid spending. The post Amy Coney Barrett Loses Favor with Conservatives After Voting Against Trump on Foreign Aid Decision appeared first on Slay News.
SCOTUS Has Passed Its First Test (Barely) — But The Harder Ones Are Coming Fast
Hello, it’s the weekend. This is The Weekender ☕️ President Trump’s attempt to unilaterally withhold foreign aid. That’s $2 billion that had not only already been allocated by Congress, but the work for which had already been completed; the plaintiffs were literally asking the government to pay its bills. It was an easy case, but a big test nonetheless; if the Supreme Court greenlit that hokum, what wouldn’t they allow? Justice Samuel Alito wro…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 48% of the sources lean Left
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
