Published 13 days ago

Amidst reports of sugar in baby foods, Supreme Court questions Centre over ‘misleading ads’

Summary by Indian Express

Hearing the Patanjali contempt case, the SC also asked the Indian Medical Association about the action it had taken against members who allegedly endorsed medicines for valuable consideration.

0 Articles

All

Left

Center

Right

NDTV

On Patanjali Misleading Ads Case, Supreme Court's Tough Questions For Centre

Hearing the Patanjali Ayurved misleading ads case, the Supreme Court has asked the government why it omitted Rule 170 from the Drugs and Magical Remedies Act, or DMR, which prohibits advertising of medicines as products with "magical" abilities.

13 days ago·New Delhi, India

Read Full Article

Indian Express

Amidst reports of sugar in baby foods, Supreme Court questions Centre over ‘misleading ads’

Hearing the Patanjali contempt case, the SC also asked the Indian Medical Association about the action it had taken against members who allegedly endorsed medicines for valuable consideration.

13 days ago·India

Read Full Article

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/year

Stories disproportionately reported by the Left or the Right

Ground News Article Assistant

Not enough coverage to generate an Article Assistant.