Published 12 hours ago • loading... • Updated 1 hour ago
US Supreme Court denies immigration judges the power to shelve deportation cases
The unsigned order leaves a nationwide injunction intact, affecting hundreds of thousands of deportation cases and blocking judges from pausing proceedings.
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court allowed a deportation settlement between President Donald Trump's administration and Texas to remain in force, rejecting an emergency request without explanation.
The settlement effectively terminates a federal regulation that allowed immigration judges to pause deportation proceedings for vulnerable individuals such as neglected children or violent-crime survivors. The Justice Department agreed to set aside the rule.
Baltimore, Columbus, and New Haven, along with Centro Legal and Raza, challenged the settlement as "egregious collusion," arguing it bypassed public participation and APA rulemaking requirements.
District Judge Reed O'Connor approved the settlement the same day. Solicitor D. John Sauer argued the challengers' request "attempts to improperly leverage a clear-cut dispute over intervention into a far-reaching attack on the merits of a consent judgment."
Connor previously ruled the challengers lacked legal standing because they were not directly affected by the settlement. The case remains pending at the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.