Australia Drafts Law to Let Users Opt Out of Social Media Algorithms
Australia

Rula Rouhana/Reuters
What Happened
What Happened
Where Sources Agree
- arrows_inputDigital Duty of Care Legislation: Multiple accounts detail that the proposed digital duty of care legislation will require social media firms to allow users to opt out of recommendation algorithms, with the draft law expected to be introduced to parliament this week, according to draft legislation.
- arrows_inputProposed Financial Penalties: Several reports converge on the introduction of financial penalties exceeding $100 million for tech companies; these fines would target platforms failing to enforce the proposed 'digital duty of care' regarding user safety, according to the draft legislation.
Where Sources Disagree
- arrows_outputAlgorithm Control Models: The government's draft 'digital duty of care' laws propose an opt-out model, allowing users to disable algorithmic feeds. In contrast, the Greens and advocacy groups argue for an opt-in requirement, contending that users should be protected by default from the addictive nature of curated content.
- arrows_outputDigital Duty of Care Framing: Government officials frame the proposed digital duty of care legislation as a necessary measure to mitigate online risks and protect users from harmful content. However, the Opposition characterizes the plan as an attempt to exert government control, expressing concerns that the legislation could lead to censorship and overreach.
Timeline
September 07, 2026
Draft digital duty revealed: In early September 2026 the government prepared an exposure draft of a 'digital duty of care' that would require platforms to offer users a choice to turn off recommender algorithms via pop‑ups, place the onus on companies to identify and mitigate risks, and impose fines of more than A$100 million for breaches. The draft was expected to be introduced to parliament that week.
September 06, 2026
Political debate and reactions: The proposed reforms prompted mixed reactions in September 2026: government ministers and Greens activists backed algorithm choice or opt‑in/opt‑out measures, while Coalition figures warned the plan risked censoring social media and questioned details and penalties. Critics also argued penalties might be insufficient and urged tougher action.
September 04, 2026
NSW roundtable after assaults: An urgent three‑hour roundtable convened on Friday, September 4, 2026, after a string of alleged sexual assaults by Sydney schoolboys and the death of a 16‑year‑old, examining how online environments and algorithms may be shaping harmful attitudes among young people. The meeting brought together experts, school sectors and victims to feed into policy responses.
Perspectives and Debates
Does the algorithm opt-out primarily serve safety and user control, or does it carry significant economic side effects?
Summaries by Ground AI
Sources
See All 80Most Written About
The stories getting the most coverage from the last 24 hours
Timeline
September 07, 2026
Draft digital duty revealed: In early September 2026 the government prepared an exposure draft of a 'digital duty of care' that would require platforms to offer users a choice to turn off recommender algorithms via pop‑ups, place the onus on companies to identify and mitigate risks, and impose fines of more than A$100 million for breaches. The draft was expected to be introduced to parliament that week.
September 06, 2026
Political debate and reactions: The proposed reforms prompted mixed reactions in September 2026: government ministers and Greens activists backed algorithm choice or opt‑in/opt‑out measures, while Coalition figures warned the plan risked censoring social media and questioned details and penalties. Critics also argued penalties might be insufficient and urged tougher action.
September 04, 2026
NSW roundtable after assaults: An urgent three‑hour roundtable convened on Friday, September 4, 2026, after a string of alleged sexual assaults by Sydney schoolboys and the death of a 16‑year‑old, examining how online environments and algorithms may be shaping harmful attitudes among young people. The meeting brought together experts, school sectors and victims to feed into policy responses.













