Skip to main content
Get facts, not fiction
Published • loading... • Updated

A Woman Will Be Compensated for Getting Pregnant After Her Partner's Failed Vasectomy

Summary by informacion.es
The Supreme Court has given reason to a marriage and has stated that the couple of a patient undergoing a vasectomy has the legitimacy to claim patrimonial responsibility to the Health Administration when the intervention fails, because they were not properly informed of the risk that existed and the consequences of pregnancy caused her "self-damage, autonomous and individualized, consisting in frustration of her capacity for reproductive self-d…

14 Articles

Lean Left

The court fixes a compensation of 35,000 for the man and an equal one for his wife because the failure of the intervention “affects both equally”

·Madrid, Spain
Read Full Article
Center

The Supreme annuls a ruling of the TSJM and establishes a compensation of €35,000 for each of the members of a couple, plus the corresponding legal interests.

·Madrid, Spain
Read Full Article
Lean Left

The High Court considers an appeal brought by the marriage and acknowledges that the partner of a patient undergoing vasectomy is also entitled to claim patrimonial responsibility from the Health Administration when the intervention fails and this risk was not adequately reported.The small print of the egg freeze: it is not a pregnancy insurance and involves going to assisted reproduction.The Supreme Court has recognized the right of a woman to …

·Madrid, Spain
Read Full Article
informacion.esinformacion.es
+2 Reposted by 2 other sources
Center

The Supreme Court has given reason to a marriage and has stated that the couple of a patient undergoing a vasectomy has the legitimacy to claim patrimonial responsibility to the Health Administration when the intervention fails, because they were not properly informed of the risk that existed and the consequences of pregnancy caused her "self-damage, autonomous and individualized, consisting in frustration of her capacity for reproductive self-d…

noticiasdealava.eusnoticiasdealava.eus
+3 Reposted by 3 other sources

The Dispute Chamber of the Supreme Court has upheld a cassation appeal filed by a marriage and has stated that the wife of the patient undergoing a vasectomy is entitled to claim patrimonial responsibility from the Health Administration when the intervention fails and this risk has not been adequately reported.

The Dispute Chamber of the Supreme Court has upheld a cassation appeal filed by a marriage and has stated that the wife of the patient undergoing a vasectomy is entitled to claim patrimonial responsibility from the Health Administration when the intervention fails and this risk has not been adequately reported.

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 50% of the sources lean Left, 50% of the sources are Center
50% Center

Factuality Info Icon

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

Info Icon

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

informacion.es broke the news on Monday, October 26, 2026.
Too Big Arrow Icon
Sources are mostly out of (0)

Similar News Topics

News
Feed Dots Icon
For You
Search Icon
Search
Blindspot LogoBlindspotLocal