Supreme Defines that Trial for Viva Democracy Takes Place in Antofagasta
4 Articles
4 Articles
The determination, which will determine the contest of jurisdiction between the Court of Appeal of Antofagasta and the Eighth Court of Guarantee, was adopted by unanimous decision of the Second Criminal Chamber, which implies that the whole case will be heard in the northern region.
The Second Chamber of the Supreme Court resolved the competition arising in the case called “Democracy Viva”, which brings together the members of Democracia Viva, Fibra, Tomarte and Fusupo in the Convention case. Determining the court legally competent to continue hearing the investigation for alleged fraud against the Fisco and laundering of assets is the Court of Guarantee of Antofagasta. The jurisdictional dispute arose after the Court of Ap…
The Second Chamber of the highest court ruled on the contest of jurisdiction that maintained the future trial of the case. The ruling confirms the jurisdiction of the Northern City Guarantee Court on the basis of the rules of territorial attribution for the foundational milestone of the fraud, revealing the processing of the edges involving seven accused. The Second Chamber of the Supreme Court put a definitive end to the extensive conflict of j…
The Second Chamber of the Supreme Court ruled on the competition arising in the case called “Democracy Viva”, which brings together the members of Democracia Viva, Fibra, Tomarte and Fusupo in the Convention case, determining that the court legally competent to continue hearing the investigation for alleged fraud against the Treasury and laundering of assets is the Court of Guarantee of Antofagasta.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
