Published 1 month ago

Supreme Court wary of restricting government contact with social media platforms in free speech case

Justice Alito criticizes the government's treatment of Facebook, comparing it to favoritism of print media.
Justice Kagan humorously admits to pressuring media to self-censor, highlighting daily occurrences in the federal government.
Contrasting opinions from Alito and Kagan showcase differing viewpoints on government interference with social media platforms.

Insights by Ground AI

Does this summary seem wrong?

0 Articles

All

Left

Center

Right

Reuters

US Supreme Court seems wary of curbing US government contacts with social media platforms

U.S. Supreme Court justices on Monday appeared skeptical of a challenge on free speech grounds to how President Joe Biden's administration encouraged social media platforms to remove posts that federal officials deemed misinformation, including about elections and COVID-19.

1 month ago·United Kingdom

Read Full Article

Associated Press News

Supreme Court seems favorable to Biden administration over efforts to combat social media posts

The Supreme Court seems likely to side with the Biden administration in a dispute with Republican-led states over how far the federal government can go to combat controversial social media

1 month ago·United States

Read Full Article

USA Today

Supreme Court live: Updates on oral arguments in social media disinformation case

Republican states charge the Biden administration has leaned on social media sites to suppress conservative views.

1 month ago·United States

Read Full Article

CNN

Takeaways from the Supreme Court’s oral arguments over social media censorship

The Supreme Court on Monday appeared deeply skeptical of arguments by two conservative states that the First Amendment bars the government from pressuring social media platforms to remove online misinformation.

1 month ago·Atlanta, United States

Read Full Article

The Washington Post

Supreme Court likely to reject limits on White House tech contacts

The Supreme Court’s decision could have sweeping implications for government’s communications with social media about elections, public health and disinformation.

1 month ago

Read Full Article

KIFI

Takeaways from the Supreme Court’s oral arguments over social media censorship

By Brian Fung and John Fritze, CNN (CNN) — The Supreme Court on Monday appeared deeply skeptical of arguments by two conservative states that the First Amendment bars the government from pressuring social media platforms to remove online misinformation. In more than 90 minutes of oral arguments that occasionally veered into the justices’ personal frustrations with the press, several conservative justices sided with the liberal wing in appearing …

1 month ago·Idaho Falls, United States

Read Full Article

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/year