Supreme Court Ruling on Annual Leave: Short-Term Leaves Alone Do Not Constitute Valid Grounds for Termination.
8 Articles
8 Articles
A landmark decision has been made regarding employees who take their annual leave in installments. The Supreme Court ruled that short-term leave taken at the employee's request and with their consent does not constitute grounds for justified termination by the employer.
Granting annual leave in increments shorter than 10 days does not, in all cases, give the employee the right to terminate the contract for just cause. The 9th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals ruled that leave divided into parts at the employee's own request and with their consent should be considered valid.
The Supreme Court ruled that annual leave taken for periods shorter than 10 days, at the employee's request and with their consent, does not, by itself, constitute grounds for justified termination. (07.09.2026, Sputnik Türkiye)
The 9th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals ruled that annual leave taken by an employee at their own request and with their consent, for periods shorter than 10 days, does not, by itself, constitute grounds for the employee to terminate their employment contract for just cause.
Haber 7 - The Supreme Court has ruled that annual leave taken for periods shorter than 10 days, at the employee's request and with their consent, does not, by itself, constitute grounds for justified termination of employment.
The 9th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals ruled that annual leave taken at the employee's request and with their consent, shorter than 10 days, does not, by itself, constitute grounds for justified termination of the employment contract.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium








