The Federal Judge of La Pampa Who Was Denounced for Ill-Treatment at Work Avoided His Dismissal.
4 Articles
4 Articles
The trial jury unanimously rejected the removal of Pablo Díaz Lacava, who could return to his post; he was being prosecuted for injuries and threats.
The Jury of Prosecution of Magistrates of the Nation unanimously rejected the removal of the judge of the Oral Court in the Federal Criminal Court of La Pampa, Pablo Díaz Lacava, and decided that he should continue in office. The process had begun after complaints of ill-treatment of workers, abuse of authority, gender-based violence and other events...
The Jury of Prosecution of the Council of the Magistracy unanimously considered that the events denounced were not serious enough to remove him from office. Read more
The Jury of Prosecution unanimously concluded that the removal of the judge, who was tried for injury and accused of ill-treatment at work, would constitute a “disproportionate dislocation.” He may return to his post.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
