Skip to main content
See every side of every news story
Published • loading... • Updated

Plahotniuc File: CSJ Rejects Appeal on Change of Judge

The Supreme Court of Justice rejected as inadmissible the appeal by which the lawyers of Vladimir Plahotniuc challenged the replacement of a full judge who judges the appeals in the case file "Bank fraud in the Court of Appeal Centre. The conclusion was issued on 22 October and is irrevocable.
DisclaimerThis story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.

4 Articles

The Supreme Court of Justice (CSJ) declared inadmissible the appeal lodged by Vladimir Plahotniuc's lawyers against the decision to replace a full judge who examines the file "Bank fraud in the Court of Appeal Centre, writes TVR Moldova. The defense challenged the legality of the change and argued that the process could be postponed until the clarification of the judge's situation

The Supreme Court of Justice rejected as inadmissible the appeal by which the lawyers of Vladimir Plahotniuc challenged the replacement of a full judge who judges the appeals in the case file "Bank fraud in the Court of Appeal Centre. The conclusion was issued on 22 October and is irrevocable.

The Supreme Court of Justice (CSJ) rejected as inadmissible the appeal of the lawyers of Vladimir Plahotniuc, who challenged the change of a judge from the complete examining the appeals in the file "Bank fraud", broadcasts TVR Moldova. On 30 September, the interim president of the Court of Appeal ordered the replacement of the judge Vitalie Budeci with Vitalie Pîslariuc. The decision was reasoned [...] Article CSJ rejected the appeal of the law…

The Supreme Court of Justice (CSJ) rejected as inadmissible the appeal of the lawyers of Vladimir Plahotniuc, who challenged the complete change of court to examine the file of the former democratic leader at the Court of Appeal Centre. The defense argued that the replacement of one of the judges would not have been legal and that the examination of the case could be postponed until the clarification of its situation.

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.

Factuality Info Icon

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

Info Icon

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

TVR MOLDOVA broke the news on Monday, October 26, 2026.
Too Big Arrow Icon
Sources are mostly out of (0)

Similar News Topics

News
Feed Dots Icon
For You
Search Icon
Search
Blindspot LogoBlindspotLocal