US EditionEPA Chief Lee Zeldin Pledges to Recover $20 Billion Allocated by Biden Administration for Climate Projects
- EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced that $20 billion in taxpayer money was 'parked' by the Biden administration at a financial institution, impacting grants to climate groups.
- Zeldin expressed concerns over how the Climate United Fund and other entities will allocate the funds, demanding the immediate return of the money to the EPA.
- Zeldin stated that the funds were appropriated under the Inflation Reduction Act for environmental projects.
- He plans to refer the matter to the agency's office of the inspector general and work with the Justice Department for accountability.
65 Articles
65 Articles
DOJ Investigating Biden Administration's 'Very Dangerous' $20 Billion 'Slush Fund'
The FBI is now in the picture as the Environmental Protection Agency investigates a $20 billion bonanza that took place in the closing months of the Biden administration. FBI agents […] The post DOJ Investigating Biden Administration's 'Very Dangerous' $20 Billion 'Slush Fund' appeared first on The Western Journal.
Lee Zeldin Is Trying to Take Back $20 Billion in Already-Awarded EPA Grants for Climate Projects
Lee Zeldin, the new head of the Environmental Protection Agency, is attempting to rescind $20 billion in grants for climate and clean energy projects that had been awarded by the Biden administration. The money was set to go to the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, known as the “green bank,” and fund projects benefiting disadvantaged communities. Zeldin also canceled a $50 million grant to the Climate Justice Alliance. The Biden administration had …
EPA Chief Seeks Return of $20 Billion in Climate Funding
The head of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said the agency will try to retrieve about $20 billion granted to environmental groups before President Donald Trump was inaugurated in January. In a video posted to the social media platform X on Wednesday, Zeldin said the EPA decided to rescind the grants for climate and clean-energy projects mainly because of concerns over lack of oversight and transparency. “The days of irresponsibly shov…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 67% of the sources lean Right
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
