BICE Bank Loses in the Supreme Court and Must Pay a Fine for Changing Mortgage Credit Rates
5 Articles
5 Articles
The highest court dismissed the bank's complaint against the conviction for unilaterally changing interest rates and failing to deliver quotes or summary sheets to mortgage clients, Sernac reported.
The highest court dismissed the appeal filed by the entity and upheld the sanction of 1,000 UTM following a complaint by SERNAC. The ruling sets a precedent for those who contribute or seek to refinance their home.
The Supreme Court upheld the sanction against the financial institution following a complaint by the Sernac for violating consumers' rights in mortgage loans.
The court sentenced the financial institution to pay a fine for the tax benefit of 1,000 Monthly Tax Units, that is, more than $72 million. It is important to remember that, consumers have the right to receive all relevant information when buying a product or contracting a service.
The court sentenced the financial institution to pay a fine for the tax benefit of 1,000 Monthly Tax Units, that is, more than $72 million. It is important to remember that, consumers have the right to receive all relevant information when buying a product or hiring a service. The Santiago Court of Appeals [...]
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium





