Published 4 days ago • loading... • Updated 4 days ago
James Comey’s Instagram seashell post sits in a murky legal zone between protected political speech and criminal threat
Comey says he did not intend a threat and that the Instagram post was protected political speech, as prosecutors must prove mens rea.
Former FBI Director James Comey faces two federal charges for an Instagram post depicting seashells spelling '86 47,' which the Department of Justice alleges constitutes a threat against President Donald Trump.
The indictment charges Comey with violating 18 U.S.C. 871 and 18 U.S.C. 875, alleging he knowingly threatened the President; prosecutors argue '86' is American slang meaning 'to throw out' or 'to get rid of.'
Arguing he lacked the requisite criminal intent, Comey maintained he posted the shells to express political opposition, stating, 'I didn't realize some folks associate those numbers with violence.'
The Supreme Court ruled in Watts v. United States that political hyperbole constitutes protected speech, holding that debate on public issues must be 'uninhibited, robust, and wideopen' rather than a 'true threat.'
District Judge Louise Flanagan set the trial for Oct. 21, positioning the case as a test of whether the post qualifies as a punishable threat or protected political expression under the First Amendment.