Gilmar Mendes Rejected Agu's Request to Change a Decision on the Impeachment of Stf Ministers
6 Articles
6 Articles
Minister of the Supreme Federal Court Gilmar Mendes rejected this Friday (4) the request of the General Advocate General of the Union to reconsider the decision on the provision which would help to blind the Court's members against the opening of impeachment proceedings. Read more (12/05/2025
You know how Gilmar Mendes' decision can block the impeachment of the ministers of the STF and what the likely reaction of the Court and Congress is.
The New Party published on this Friday, 4th in its profile in X, a criticism of the decision of Minister Gilmar Mendes of the Supreme Court of the Federal Court (STF), which limits the application by the Prosecutor-General of the Republic (PGR) for impeachment by the ministers of the Court. According to the sign, Gilmar would have “allowed” to change the rule because his parents could not... The post “Gilmar agreed to change the rule by understa…
Minister of the Supreme Federal Court (STF), Gilmar Mendes rejected this Friday, 4, the request to reconsider his decision on the Law of the Impeachment. The judge had been sought by the Advocate-General of the Union, Jorge Messias, who was instructed by the Government of Lula to take the leave left by Luis Roberto Barroso in the Court. However, Gilmar decided not to return. The case was incorporated into ADPF 1.259. The decision was signed, exe…
Minister Gilmar Mendes, of the Supreme Federal Court (STF), rejected this Friday a request from the Union Advocate-General (AGU) to amend his decision by restricting the rules for impeaching ministers of the Court. The AGU had requested that the decision be reconsidered and that the effects of the liminary be suspended until the deliberation by the other ministers, marked to take place on 12 December. For Gilmar, its decision has "feeded in the …
Minister Gilmar Mendes, decanon of the Supreme Federal Court (STF), said on this Thursday (4) that the law on impeachment which dealt with the departure of the ministers of the Court “lost”, that is, lost the validity of the action of the time. Mendes defended the decision to limit (provisional) that it had suspended the law and established the interpretation that only the Attorney General of the Republic (GGR) had the legitimacy to accuse the S…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium





