Skip to main content
Discover what's not being covered
Published • loading... • Updated

D66 Will Not Scrap Coercion From the Distribution Law: 'We Need It'

Summary by nieuwrechts.nl
D66 is not backing down. For asylum spokesperson Robert van Asten, removing the coercion element from the Distribution Act is out of the question. “We simply need that element,” he said on Café Kockelmann on WNL. Without coercion, he argues, all municipalities that do not want to provide shelter would simply say no.

2 Articles

Right

Your municipal council can say no to an asylum seekers' centre. Your village can fill the public gallery to the last seat. It makes no difference to D66. "We simply need that element," says D66 asylum spokesperson Robert van Asten regarding the coercion in the Distribution Act. Van Asten said this on Café Kockelmann at W...

D66 is not backing down. For asylum spokesperson Robert van Asten, removing the coercion element from the Distribution Act is out of the question. “We simply need that element,” he said on Café Kockelmann on WNL. Without coercion, he argues, all municipalities that do not want to provide shelter would simply say no.

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 100% of the sources lean Right
100% Right

Factuality Info Icon

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

Info Icon

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

dagelijksestandaard.nl broke the news on Saturday, October 24, 2026.
Too Big Arrow Icon
Sources are mostly out of (0)
News
Feed Dots Icon
For You
Search Icon
Search
Blindspot LogoBlindspotLocal