Get access to our best features
Get access to our best features
Published

Courting an escaped mischief

Summary by The Monthly
In the wake of the High Court ruling in Bird v DP (2024) HCA 41, which found that priests are not employees and therefore the Catholic Church cannot be held vicariously responsible for their actions, a robust exchange of jurisprudence broke out between the unrepresented plaintiff and the court during final submissions in the case of Haddock v The Roman Catholic Ecclesiastical Province (of Melb).
Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 100% of the sources lean Left
100% Left
Factuality

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

Sources are mostly out of (0)