CJP's Saurav Das Alleges Puducherry Police Questioned His Family, Claims ‘Intimidation’ at Centre’s Behest
Police called the home visit a routine security check ahead of Independence Day and denied allegations of harassment.
- On Wednesday, Cockroach Janta Party spokesperson Saurav Das alleged that Puducherry Police intimidated his family at their home, though authorities dismissed the claims as false.
- Das questioned whether the police action was linked to Union Home Minister Amit Shah's recent visit to Puducherry, where Shah met the territory's Home Minister and Lieutenant Governor.
- A senior Puducherry police official rejected the harassment allegations, stating the visit was a 'routine exercise' to ask security questions ahead of Independence Day.
- CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke separately claimed the organization faced difficulties securing a Delhi venue for volunteers' meeting, alleging hall owners refused rentals due to 'pressure from above.'
- Expanding its activities, the CJP will launch its 'School Thik Karo' campaign on August 15 in Maharashtra's Hingoli, aiming to improve facilities in village government schools.
15 Articles
15 Articles
CJP leader Saurav claims Puducherry Police intimidated his family at HM Amit Shah's behest
Saurav Das linked Union Home Minister Amit Shah’s recent visit to Pudduchery to the police’s visit to his family home. He claimed that Shah met Pondicherry Home Minister and Lieutenant Governor and “planned the intimidation tactic”.
CJP’s Saurav Das Alleges Family Intimidation, Puducherry Police Call It Routine I-Day Security Drill
A routine security verification ahead of Independence Day has triggered a political controversy in Puducherry after Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) co-convenor and chief spokesperson Saurav Das accused the police of questioning his family and attempting to intimidate him. Das raised the
What Puducherry Police said over visit to Saurav Das’ home: ‘Routine Independence Day eve drill’
Das alleged that the Bharatiya Janata Party-backed (BJP) government in Puducherry was ‘intimidating’ his family and claimed that the action was not in keeping with the character of the Union Territory government.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 58% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium



















