ArXiv to Ban Researchers for a Year if They Submit AI Slop
The preprint server said one strike will trigger a ban and appeals will be allowed when papers include hallucinated references or chatbot notes.
8 Articles
8 Articles
ArXiv will ban researchers who upload papers full of AI slop
ArXiv, a popular platform for preprint academic research, is taking a new step to attempt to reduce the volume of papers that include AI slop. If a paper has "incontrovertible evidence that the authors did not check the results of LLM generation," such as hallucinated references or "meta-comments" left by an LLM, authors will be banned from ArXiv for a year, according to Thomas Dietterich, ArXiv's section chair of its computer science section. F…
404media.co
ArXiv to Ban Researchers for a Year if They Submit AI Slop
ArXiv, the open-access repository of preprint academic research, will ban authors of papers for a year if they submit obviously AI-generated work. Late Thursday evening, Thomas Dietterich, chair of the computer science section of ArXiv, wrote on X: “If generative AI tools generate inappropriate language, plagiarized content, biased content, errors, mistakes, incorrect references, or misleading content, and that output is included in scientific w…
AI-generated papers flood submissions to scientific journals
arXiv, the largest host of pre-peer-reviewed scientific papers, will now ban scientists for a year if their research contains hallucinated references or other obviously AI-generated content. The research repository’s chairman said authors have “full responsibility” for the content of works published in their name. AI is boosting scientific research, but also facilitating fraud: Submissions to one journal have risen 42% since ChatGPT’s launch, an…
ArXiv, a popular preprint academic research platform, is taking new steps to try to reduce the number of papers containing AI-related dross. According to Thomas Dietrich, chair of ArXiv's Computer Science department, if a paper has irrefutable evidence that the authors did not examine large models...
ArXiv, the repository of preprint academic research, says it will ban authors for a year if their papers have "incontrovertible evidence" of AI-generated work (Samantha Cole/404 Media)
Samantha Cole / 404 Media: ArXiv, the repository of preprint academic research, says it will ban authors for a year if their papers have “incontrovertible evidence” of AI-generated work — The change comes as arXiv and others struggle to manage an influx of AI-generated materials masquerading as rigorous science.
Thomas G. Dietrich, Professor Emeritus at Oregon State University and head of the Computer Science section of the unpeer-reviewed paper repository "arXiv," has announced a new policy on X (formerly Twitter) stating that "the author is responsible for any errors caused by generative AI tools."
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources lean Left
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
