Gingrich Applauds Trump’s Iran Agreement: ‘It Is Hard to Understand What They Thought the Alternative Should Be’

Analysis: Trump’s Iran agreement may be a dud, but he’s getting what he wants

Why did Trump sign the Iran MOU?

Gingrich Applauds Trump’s Iran Agreement

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich praised President Donald Trump's agreement with Iran, saying that the deal represents a major foreign policy achievement and a realistic alternative to either appeasing Tehran or committing U.S. troops to another large-scale Middle East conflict. The post Gingrich Applauds Trump’s Iran Agreement: ‘It Is Hard to Understand What They Thought the Alternative Should Be’ appeared first on Breitbart.

Gingrich Applauds Trump’s Iran Agreement: ‘It Is Hard to Understand What They Thought the Alternative Should Be’

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich is throwing his support behind President Donald Trump’s agreement with Iran, calling it a significant diplomatic breakthrough that avoids both appeasement and another costly American military intervention in the Middle East. Writing on his website, Gingrich argued that Trump successfully brought together a broad coalition of international partners while applying economic and military leverage that forced Tehran into a far weaker negotiating position than it previously held. He also brushed aside criticism from opponents across the political spectrum, saying many detractors rushed to condemn the agreement without first examining its contents. “Negotiating with Iran, monitoring its commitments and occasionally having to pressure the dictatorship militarily or economically is simply reality. (Remember Ronald Reagan’s advice to ‘Trust but verify’ and Connie Mack’s ‘You get what you inspect, not what you expect.’) There will be no end to the requirement to police, monitor, and occasionally penalize the religious dictatorship,” Gingrich wrote. “The leaders of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps will try to push for as much influence and flexibility as they can get away with. It’s simply their nature.” Gingrich went on to defend the agreement itself, arguing that many of its critics have failed to propose a workable alternative. “A lot of people on the right and left have already criticized the upcoming agreement — even when they have never seen it,” Gingrich wrote. “It is hard to understand what they thought the alternative should be.” According to Gingrich, Trump charted a middle course between what he characterized as the Obama-Biden strategy toward Iran and the prospect of a major ground war, while simultaneously preventing Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons. “President Trump steered a course between the Barack Obama-Joe Biden appeasement model and strategy which would have required a huge ground invasion,” Gingrich wrote. “He used our technological strengths in airpower and intelligence capabilities to bludgeon the religious dictatorship into positions far distant from where they were under Obama and Biden.” The former speaker also credited Trump with building international support for a more stable regional order, saying numerous countries have aligned with Washington’s efforts to counter Iranian aggression and reduce tensions in the Middle East. “President Trump has been managing a broad coalition which is committed to a more stable Middle East and is prepared to work together despite Iranian attacks,” Gingrich wrote. Since Gingrich published his remarks, reports have indicated that Trump formally signed an agreement with Iran intended to end the conflict and create a pathway toward a broader peace arrangement. Under the framework, Iran pledged not to pursue nuclear weapons, while the United States agreed to seek sanctions relief and support economic development initiatives during the next phase of negotiations. {Matzav.com}