'Alarm bells': Labor seats favoured in grants scheme
Centre for Public Integrity analysis found 73.2% of the $560 million program went to safe and marginal Labor seats.
- A Centre for Public Integrity study found 73.2% of the $560 million Major and Local Community Infrastructure program flowed to safe Labor seats and marginal electorates targeted at the 2025 federal election.
- Critics compared this invite-only program to the controversial $100 million 'sports rorts' scheme, noting it excluded 45 electorates from applying and raised questions about whether taxpayer money was allocated on merit by the Labor Party.
- Analysis showed $409.1 million of the total fund went to Labor-held seats, including a $6 million grant for Marrickville Golf Club in Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's electorate, while Coalition-held seats received $126.3 million.
- Infrastructure Minister Catherine King insisted on Tuesday the program followed "longstanding practice," while Coalition infrastructure spokeswoman Senator Bridget McKenzie criticized the transparency, calling it "very, very opaque."
- Professor Gabrielle Appleby of the Centre for Public Integrity stated the controversy is "bigger than one program or one government," as research showed no link between funding and community need.
15 Articles
15 Articles
'Pork-barrelling': Shortland among Labor seats handed lion's share of $560m grants
A new report reveals 73.2 per cent of a $560 million community grants program favoured Labor electorates. Uncover why experts say this raises "alarm bells".
Labor accused of ‘sports rorts’ pork-barrelling as $400m flows to party seats
Electorates left out of the Commonwealth’s invite-only community grants program claim local groups were denied a fair go as $409 million flowed into Labor territory.
'Misuse of public money': Allegations of pork-barrelling hit government
The Centre for Public Integrity warns that the federal government appears to have pork-barrelled a $560 million "invitation-only" fund, directing the vast majority to safe Labor seats and marginal seats it wanted to win.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 54% of the sources lean Left
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium














