Why not deny bow-and-arrow symbol to both Sena factions, SC asks EC
The bench questioned whether the poll panel should have denied the bow-and-arrow symbol to both Shiv Sena factions while disqualification cases were pending.
6 Articles
6 Articles
Why not deny bow-and-arrow symbol to both Sena factions, SC asks EC
The Supreme Court has questioned the Election Commission's decision to allot the Shiv Sena's bow-and-arrow symbol to the Eknath Shinde faction, asking if the possibility of denying the symbol to both factions was adequately considered. The court also raised concerns about using legislative majority as a test while disqualification proceedings against MLAs were pending. The Shinde faction argued for the validity of the legislative majority test, …
Shiv Sena Supreme Court: During the hearing of the Shiv Sena dispute, the Supreme Court said it would examine the impartiality of the Election Commission. The court asked whether all options were considered before making the decision.
In the Shiv Sena's bow and arrow election mark dispute, the Supreme Court asked important questions to the Election Commission. The court questioned the option of giving separate marks to both groups.
Shivsena Symbol Live Hearing: In the hearing on the Shiv Sena party and the symbol, Shinde group's lawyer Neeraj Kaul made two important arguments. He said that the Election Commission's decision is correct based on the number of legislators in the legislature party and that MLA disqualification has nothing to do with this matter. Everyone's attention is on whether this argument will change the outcome and who will be shocked.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources lean Left, 50% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
