SubscribeLogin
Published

Newly-Minted Objections to 30(b)(6) Deposition Topics Are Too Late: eDiscovery Case Law

Summary by LexBlog
In U.S. v. Novo Nordisk, Inc., Washington District Judge Benjamin H. Settle rejected Washington state’s objections to defendant’s 30(b)(6) deposition topics, stating: “The State’s newly-minted objections to the deposition topics come far too late, and are not persuasive.” He also denied without prejudice Washington’s motion to compel Defendant to “de-designate” documents it claimed were improperly designated as “confidential”. The post Newly-Min…
Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

Sources are mostly out of (0)
Stories disproportionately reported by the Left or the Right

Similar News Topics

Washington StateWashington State
Trending Topics
App Store IconPlay Store Icon
CompanyAboutHistoryMissionBlogTestimonialsGroup SubscriptionsSubscribeGiftFree TrialCareersAffiliates
HelpHelp CenterFAQContact UsFor Educators/LibrariesMedia Bias RatingsOwnership and Factuality RatingsReferral CodeNews SourcesTopics
ToolsAppBrowser ExtensionDaily NewsletterBlindspot Report NewsletterBurst Your Bubble NewsletterTimelines
DonatePrivacy PolicyManage CookiesTerms and Conditions
© 2024 Snapwise Inc
News
For You
Search
BlindspotLocal