Published 11 hours ago • loading... • Updated 11 hours ago

How Minnesota members of Congress use taxpayer-funded 'franking'

Minnesota congressional members are increasing their use of taxpayer-funded 'franked' communications during this election year, a practice critics say blurs the line between information and campaign promotion.
Established by the Continental Congress 250 years ago, the congressional frank originally provided free postage for newsletters but now covers digital ads and texts funded through a lawmaker's annual 'representational allowance' averaging $1.9 million.
Rep. Michelle Fischbach, R-7th District, led the delegation with 55 communications last year and spent about $51,000 to send 50 more this year. Rep. Angie Craig, D-2nd District, spent more than $56,000 on 12 communications in the first quarter.
Annelise Russell, a professor at the University of Kentucky's Martin School of Public Policy, notes these messages provide incumbents an electoral advantage, though their cost pales compared to overall campaign spending. "I think anything that connects lawmakers to the public is positive," Russell said.
National data shows this trend extends beyond Minnesota, with more than 24,000 submissions for franking approvals during the 118th Congress. Members who won their last election by small margins send significantly more of these communications than those whose seats are secure.

Insights by Ground AI

12 Articles

Duluth News Tribune

+11 Reposted by 11 other sources

Center

How Minnesota members of Congress use taxpayer-funded 'franking'

For most of the history of Congress, “franking” referred to free postage to send newsletters, postcards and other missives to constituents. Now it includes other forms of communication.

11 hours ago·Cherokee County, United States

Read Full Article

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/year