His Passport Was Revoked, Preventing Him From Pursuing His doctorate... Constitutional Court Rules that His Rights Were Violated.
5 Articles
5 Articles
The Constitutional Court ruled that preventing a public official from beginning doctoral studies abroad due to the cancellation of their passport on the grounds of disciplinary and criminal investigations constituted a violation of rights. The court determined that the rights to respect for private life and education had been violated.
The Constitutional Court's General Assembly ruled that a public official whose passport was revoked due to ongoing disciplinary and criminal investigations suffered a violation of their rights. The High Court determined that the applicant, who was unable to pursue doctoral studies abroad due to the passport revocation, had their "right to respect for private life" and "right to education" violated.
The Constitutional Court's General Assembly ruled that the rights to respect for private life and education were violated in the case of a public official whose passport was revoked due to administrative investigations preventing him from pursuing doctoral studies abroad.
The Constitutional Court ruled on a violation on the individual application of a public official whose passport was revoked on the grounds of a disciplinary and criminal investigation of him. The Supreme Court ruled that the restriction imposed by administrative order violated the right to respect for private life and education.
The Constitutional Court's General Assembly has ruled on the application of a public official whose passport was revoked due to disciplinary and criminal investigations. The Constitutional Court stated that the practice violated the constitutional guarantees of respect for private life and education...
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources lean Left
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
