PowerData/Aya: Flavius Has 45% versus 44% Lula in the Second Turn
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.8 Articles
8 Articles
Research PowerData/Aya released on Thursday (3) shows that Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT) and Flávio Bolsonaro (PL) maintained the technical tie in the second round of elections 2026, but with the senator numerically ahead of the president and candidate for re-election. Flávio Bolsonaro has 45% and Lula, 44% of voting intentions. In the previous [...]
Levantamento was held between August 30 and September 2, with 3,000 voters in 716 municipalities; margin of error is 1.8 percentage point. Power Data research released on Thursday (3) shows a scenario of balance in the presidential dispute. In the second round, Senator Flávio Bolsonaro (PL-RJ) and President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva [...]
https:///cnnbrasil/status/2095459792508645777?s=46 https://x.com/eleicaobr2026/status/2095467651766059050?s=46 https://x.com/eleicaobr2026/status/2095468475321835574?s=46
The latest research PoderData, released on Thursday (3), points to a technical tie between Senator Flávio Bolsonaro (PL-RJ) and President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT) in a second round simulation for the presidential election of 2026. Flávio appears numerically ahead, with 45% of voting intentions, against 44% of Lula. As [...]
Senator Flávio Bolsonaro (PL-RJ) appears numerically in front of President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva in the main second-round simulation of the research PoderData/Aya, released this Thursday, 3. The liberal records 45% of the voting intentions, against 44% of the petist. The difference, however, is within the margin of error of the survey, which characterizes technical tie between the two candidates. Whites and nulls add 8%, while 3% of the inte…
PL candidate oscillated 1 percentage point up in 7 days and appears numerically ahead of the PT opponent for the first time; difference remains within the margin of error
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
