US EditionPublished • loading... • Updated
Lawsuit challenges DeSantis’ authority to call special session for Florida redistricting
- On Thursday, plaintiffs filed a suit with the Florida Supreme Court saying Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis lacks authority to call a mid‑decade redistricting session and asks the court to void his proclamation or require proof of authority.
- Last month, DeSantis proclaimed an April special session to redraw districts, but the lawsuit contends reapportionment is a legislative power violating Florida's separation-of-powers.
- The lawsuit targets Gov. Ron DeSantis and Florida Secretary of State Cord Byrd, noting Byrd directed county supervisors to implement rules used only in redistricting years.
- Redrawing Florida districts could carry big consequences for national GOP efforts tied to President Donald Trump's plan and nationwide redistricting trends that produce a net three-seat advantage for Republicans in the U.S. House.
- The legal backdrop includes the 2010 Fair Districts amendment approved by more than 60% of voters and a Florida Supreme Court ruling last July upholding a DeSantis-backed map.
Insights by Ground AI
23 Articles
23 Articles
Florida residents file petition asking court to stop DeSantis’ redistricting effort
A petition filed in the Florida Supreme Court says DeSantis' call for a special session on redistricting is unconstitutional and an effort to commander power that lies with the Legislature.
·Orlando, United States
Read Full Article
2 South Florida voters file lawsuit challenging DeSantis' power to redraw state congressional districts
The petition, filed by Miami-Dade and Broward County residents, also questions DeSantis' directive to Secretary of State Cord Byrd, which included a delay in Congressional qualifying from the week of April 20 to June 8 to June 12.
·United States
Read Full Article
Coverage Details
Total News Sources23
Leaning Left7Leaning Right3Center11Last UpdatedBias Distribution53% Center
Bias Distribution
- 53% of the sources are Center
53% Center
L 33%
C 53%
14%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
