Published 1 year ago

Replay: Indiana Supreme Court hears abortion law arguments

Summary by Ground News

A lower court judge blocked the law shortly after it took effect in September. The state's highest court then agreed to hear the state's appeal directly. The law bans almost all abortion services with few exceptions. Those exceptions include cases of rape or incest, with a 10-week time limit, and when the fetus is diagnosed with a lethal fetal anomaly.

0 Articles

All

Left

Center

Right

abc 7 Chicago

Abortion law Indiana: Near total ban goes before state Supreme Court Thursday

Is abortion legal in Indiana? Although the state was the first to enact some restrictions, abortions have been allowed since a judge blocked the law.

1 year ago·Chicago, United States

Read Full Article

Alternet

Indiana Supreme Court to determine fate of the state’s GOP-backed abortion ban

As the 50th Anniversary of Roe v. Wade approaches, Indiana’s Supreme Court is set to hear a case that will determine the fate of the state’s GOP-backed abortion ban, which were enacted last year, The Associated Press reports.Indiana’s attorney general’s office and attorneys from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Indiana, who are representing Planned Parenthood and other advocates challenging the strict ban, will argue the case of whet…

1 year ago·Washington, United States

Read Full Article

Indy Star

Replay: Indiana Supreme Court hears abortion law arguments

Attorneys for the State of Indiana want the state's top court to undo an injunction that froze Indiana's near-total abortion ban in September.

1 year ago·Indianapolis, United States

Read Full Article

WWBL

Indiana Supreme Court Takes Up Near-Total Abortion Ban Challenge

Indiana’s supreme court will hear arguments today in a challenge to the state’s near-total ban on abortion. A county judge blocked the law in September after abortion care providers including Planned Parenthood and Whole Woman’s Health challenged it shortly before the law was to take effect. They argue that it violates the state constitution’s right to liberty.

1 year ago·Washington, United States

Read Full Article